Sophia Loren sat down next to Jared Leto at
the center of the VIP section, wearing a red crystal-embroidered dress
engineered over her still-impressive curves.
Just down the row was
little Chloë Moretz, wearing a cloudy gray chiffon top, also sparkling
with crystals.
Who knows how deliberately these things are orchestrated,
but by coincidence or not, they were about to watch an Armani Privé
collection for fall which was entirely in black, white, and red. “Three
basic colors, tone on tone,” Mr. Armani said.
The
first third explored Armani’s tailoring—short swing coats, sometimes
over shorts, a pantsuit with a geometric bell cut into the sleeves, and
jackets with fluted peplums.
Flashes of strong lacquer red (an echo of
Armani’s abiding love of Asia) built through the collection until it was
fully out there in long evening dresses of the sleekness that endears
so many movie stars to Mr. Armani.
Still, he wasn’t in the mood
for sticking to the predictable straight and narrow this season. There
was a distinct aura of whimsy—or call it dottiness—about the way he
started to whip up meters of tulle into skirts as densely frilled as
pom-poms, and add headdresses and net veils smothered with red or black
polka dots.
Part playful, part a nod to a classic trope of fifties haute
couture imagery, the veiling eventually grew to cover one or two
models, and their dresses, entirely. When the finale dressed
appeared—including a black dress with multiple white dots under a
black-and-white spotted veil—the model looked as if she’d been caught up
in a snowstorm on a winter’s night. In a nice way.
Visualizzazione post con etichetta still looks. Mostra tutti i post
Visualizzazione post con etichetta still looks. Mostra tutti i post
martedì 22 luglio 2014
Fall 2014 Couture.Maison Martin Margiela
One connecting theme has come out of Paris
this week—the way major designers have been going back over the history
of haute couture: for example, both Raf Simons at Christian Dior and
Karl Lagerfeld at Chanel wended their ways back to eighteenth-century
court dress, and returned with reinterpretations exquisitely remade for
modern princesses. Amusingly, this puts Maison Martin Margiela in a plum
position this season, since this house was actually founded on the repurposing and
reframing of old, vintage, historical things (often including trash) in
cool, wearable ways. So: bright and early on Wednesday morning, the
audience at the Margiela “Artisanal” show was not given a reproduction
of the work of the seminal Parisian couturier Paul Poiret, but
confronted by a piece of the actual thing, a beautiful faded brocade
vest whose provenance was explained in the program as “Probably part of a
costume for an Oriental party given by Denise and Paul Poiret. . . . ”
It dates from about 1910, and with forensically transparent accuracy, is
noted to have been bought this year in an auction at Drouot in
Paris—Lot 26, to be precise. Without a glance at the notes, however, it
was the one thing in the collection the women in the room craned their
necks to look at and (you can feel these things in the moment) envied
most.
Still, that one piece opens up yet another maze of questions and contradictions. Margiela’s “Artisanal” line isn’t officially haute couture at all. Martin Margiela, when he was operating in the nineties, was interested only in elevating cheap, available flea-market items and transforming them into clothes for an egalitarian intelligentsia who enjoyed his antiestablishment subtexts and subtle jokes about fashion.
The way Margiela patched in the past was fully in the French “bricolage” tradition—a rough-edged method which was termed “deconstruction” in the nineties. As excellent as it always was, the whole point was the way it was calculated to be outsider; deliberately the kind of clothing rich people would never want or understand.
The
baton has now been passed to a younger team, which is operating in a
new commerical reality more than twenty years after Margiela began.
Probably their customers now are members of the art world—the women who
dress to stand out as avant-garde as they negotiate multimillion-dollar
transactions in the gallery booths of Miami Art Basel and the Frieze
fairs in London and New York.
Against that particular social backdrop, this collection makes complete sense. It still looks rough and ready. It is composed of mad things like defunct coins as embroidery, and vintage late forties Japanese souvenir bomber jackets. In 2014, there’s a whole new type of supermoneyed art and music people in the world who value cool over convention. And maybe, they’ll be looking here.
Still, that one piece opens up yet another maze of questions and contradictions. Margiela’s “Artisanal” line isn’t officially haute couture at all. Martin Margiela, when he was operating in the nineties, was interested only in elevating cheap, available flea-market items and transforming them into clothes for an egalitarian intelligentsia who enjoyed his antiestablishment subtexts and subtle jokes about fashion.
The way Margiela patched in the past was fully in the French “bricolage” tradition—a rough-edged method which was termed “deconstruction” in the nineties. As excellent as it always was, the whole point was the way it was calculated to be outsider; deliberately the kind of clothing rich people would never want or understand.
Against that particular social backdrop, this collection makes complete sense. It still looks rough and ready. It is composed of mad things like defunct coins as embroidery, and vintage late forties Japanese souvenir bomber jackets. In 2014, there’s a whole new type of supermoneyed art and music people in the world who value cool over convention. And maybe, they’ll be looking here.
Iscriviti a:
Post (Atom)








